Why Doesn't Communism Work? : Explainlikeimfive ~ NewsWire

If there is a God, and God can do anything, then why doesn't He just show Himself, then it would be a whole lot easier to believe... We all might ask this...Транскрипция и произношение слова "doesn't" в британском и американском вариантах. Подробный перевод и примеры.Why do some people fold their toilet paper, and some scrunch it, both parties refusing to adopt to the So why don't more people learn to invest? It's because they haven't defined the right path for them...See more of Why doesn,t life run according to plan on Facebook.The structure 'why should' can be used to express surprise. I wonder why anyone should want to do something like that. 'Why not + infinitive without to' can be used to make suggestions.

doesn't - транскрипция, произношение и перевод онлайн - Myefe

Why don't these people get it. They keep on submitting the biggest craploads I've ever seen. Member Level 11 Blank Slate. Why Doesn"t Anyone Get It 2007-11-24 21:18:53. i just am getting really pissed...In the US, 80% of girls have been on a diet by the time they're 10 years old. In this honest, raw talk, neuroscientist Sandra Aamodt uses her personal story to frame an important lesson about how our...Have you ever asked the question, why doesn't prayer work? Why at times does it appear that God ignores us when we pray to Him. Many have prayed for God to intervene and solve a problem that..."Why The Future Doesn't Need Us" is an article written by Bill Joy (then Chief Scientist at Sun Microsystems) in the April 2000 issue of Wired magazine. In the article, he argues that "Our most powerful 21st-century technologies—robotics, genetic engineering...

Why doesn't everyone learn how to invest? - Quora

Why isn't there a president in some countries? Well, different countries have different histories and political systems.Why doesn't this simple code example work? Why does the word order change when we use a Historically, this may have developed because in Elizabethan English, both Why does this simple...Why Men Don't Call.3.She asked, "Why doesn`t this machine work?" 4.He said, "Don`t sell the car."You begin to wonder why you're killing yourself when there's nothing special to achieve....unless you kiss the ass of Communist party members and become one of them.

I would not have a good solution for the query "Why does 'Why doesn't it work?' become 'Why does it not work?'" The shift is doubly intriguing if (like me) you don't see a compelling reason (beyond mere convention) why "Why doesn't it paintings?" couldn't be rendered as "Why does no longer it paintings?"

Though every other answerers right here imagine the wording "why does not it paintings?" to be ungrammatical, they haven't defined in a lot intensity why they take that view. Indisputably the word sounds awkward—possibly as a result of we are so strongly acclimated to the wording "why does it not paintings?" as the standard alternative to "why doesn't it paintings?"—however from a purely grammatical viewpoint, I've trouble seeing how "why does now not it paintings?" differs structurally from, say, "why does no longer it occur more steadily?" And if we deem all questions of the form "Why does not…" ungrammatical, how can we distinguish them from questions of the (somewhat) more practical form "Does now not…"? Or are the latter formulations, too, ungrammatical?

Ultimately, it kind of feels to me, concluding that wording of the form "why does not" is ungrammatical would logically lead us to condemn a great many sentences that, even though old-fashioned sounding, don't seem to wreck any elementary rules of sentence building and in a position comprehensibility. Let's take a take a look at one of the vital many historic cases of this wording.

In the 1600s and 1700s, writers no longer on occasion hired interrogative phrases reminiscent of "does now not the," "do not the," "isn't the," and "are now not the"—as a Google Books seek for those words makes clear. From Izak Walton, The Compleat Angler, or the Contemplative Man's Recreation (1653):

Piscator. Now, Sir, has no longer my Hostis made haste? And does no longer the fish look beautiful?

From Richard Baxter, The Saints Everlasting Rest (1654):

Doth now not this Load-stone clutch thy center unto it, and almost draw it forth of thy brest? Canst thou read the history of affection any more directly? Doth not thy throbbing middle right here stop to ease it self? And dost thou now not as Joseph, search for a position to weep in? or do not the tears of thy Love bedew these strains?

From Thomas Hobbes, "Problems of Vacuum," in Seven Philosophical Problems, and Two Propositions of Geometry (1662):

If there have been empty space in the World, why will have to not there be additionally some empty area in the Vial prior to it used to be sucked? And then why does now not the water rise to fill that, when a guy sucks the Vial he attracts nothing out neither into his Belly nor into his Lungs, nor into his Mouth ; handiest he sets the Air throughout the glass into a circular movement, giving it without delay an enterprise to go forth by the sucking and an undertaking to go back through no longer receiving it into his mouth.

From John Tillotson, "The Prejudices towards Jesus and his Religion consider'd," in The Works of the Most Revered Dr. John Tillotson, Late Lord Archbishop of Canterbury (1717):

Whatever commendation may be given to any Art or Science, Men will query the Truth and Reality of it, when they see the greatest a part of those that profess it, no longer ready to do any thing answerable to it. The Christian Religion pretends to be an Art of serving God more decently and devoutly, and of living higher than different Men ; but when or not it's so, why don't the Professors of this very good Religion shew the Force and Virtue of it of their Lives?

From Thomas Rutherford, An Essay on the Nature and Obligations of Virtue (1744):

There is an undeserving software made in giving pain to brutes; why then is not this a consistent explanation why against every motion, which gives ache to them? why does now not it make every such motion irrational and so not worthy for a rational agent? Is it since the use we have of them and the benefits we receive from their ache is a more potent reason why, which intervenes? Then why isn't this explanation why from pastime, which helps to keep us clear of any crime in killing or in hurting them, enough to make the similar conduct against our personal species neither irrational nor incorrect?

From Erasmus Darwin & Robert Waring Darwin, Zoonomia; or The Laws of Organic Life, volume 2 (1796):

If the torpor of the uterine veins, which induces the per month sessions of the catamenia, be governed by the rise of terrene gravitation ; that is, through the deficiency of the counter-influence of solar and lunar gravitation ; why does no longer it happen most frequently when the terrene gravitation is the greatest, as about six hours after the brand new moon, and subsequent to that about six hours after the total moon?

Examples persisted to look repeatedly through the mid-1830s. From R.U. West, "on the Influence of the Nerves," in London Medical and Surgical Journal (March 12, 1832):

And why does now not it happen under all instances, for bodies all the time develop cold after dying? Many physiologists contend that the blood in the venæ cavæ is propelled into the precise auricle by way of the atmospheric power, because of this of a vacuum formed there by means of its dilation.

But such expressions seem all of sudden to have change into much much less commonplace in the second one part of the nineteenth century, for causes unknown to me.

In a Google Books search for the word "why does now not the" covering the three a long time between 1978 and 2008, many of the matches come from books on economics, philosophy, ethics, and faith, in all probability since the diction sounds suitably out of date and sermon-inflected. In any case, cases do still appear. Here are three instances. From Immanuel Wallerstein, "The Rural Economy in Modern World Society" (1975), printed in The Capitalist World-Economy (1979):

I would word the intellectual questions of our time—which are the ethical questions of our time—as follows: (1) Why is there starvation amidst plenty, and poverty amidst prosperity? (2) Why do not the numerous who are afflicted rise up against the few who are privileged, and smite them? You might notice that I have affected the language of the King James version of the Bible. I've done this to sign two things. At one degree our issues are biblical ones, this is everlasting ones, ones that confront all of human history. But at a 2nd degree, they tackle a in particular modern shape, of a world whose origins within the 16th are heralded precisely via this King James version—a new language for a new era.

From G.L.S. Shackle, Epistemics and Economics (1992)

If the term cycle is justified, the whole lot crucial to the cycle must be present in any 'provide moment'. Then the issue is, why do not these kinds of composing components unravel themselves at once, why does no longer 'the cycle' disappear through a single, comprehensive and rapid adjustment?

From Arthur W. Pink, The Attributes of God (2002):

And what of apostate Christendom, the place each imaginable type of sin is now tolerated and practiced under duvet of the holy title of Christ? Why does now not the righteous wrath of Heaven make an finish of such abominations? Only one solution is imaginable: because God bears with "much longsuffering the vessels of wrath suited to destruction."

A Google Books search even finds 3 instances of the word "why does now not it work" in fresh publications. From Consumer Energy Price Increases: Hearing Before the Subcommittee at the Consumer of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation (August 7, 1990):

Senator LIEBERMAN. If all this is true, then why does not it work in reverse? In other words, if the increase in the world price, on account of expectancies, since you are, planning to buy the coming provide of crude oil bids up the associated fee? Why does no longer it work the opposite direction when the world price drops, why does now not the associated fee pass down?

From Ronald Finklestein, Celebrating Success! The Power of Attitude! (2003):

You give your self permission to just accept and express this excellent. Thank you spirit and so it is! So why does now not it paintings at all times? Let me percentage with you some issues that may battle with you achieving you life's dream.

And from Nubar Sarafyan, The Action Principle and Evolution (2009):

But if that is true, then how can one explain the life the large gravity inside of the barred galaxies and black holes, where matter moderate density, obviously, is far much less. Besides, if the gravity is the only situation of life, then why does now not it paintings in the limits of galaxy nucleus, through which the energy huge transmission processes permanently take place.

These examples refute the notion that nobody makes use of the wording "why does not"—even on the subject of the awkward and decidedly unidiomatic "why does now not it work." Nor is it evident to me that the construction is illogical or fatally incoherent. It sounds a bit odd, indisputably, and it's slightly uncommon (which is almost definitely why it sounds extraordinary), however—if I would possibly channel the voice of Senator Lieberman for a moment—why should now not we view it as grammatically applicable?